Hiring the wrong person—or spending too much time on an innovation challenge—can cost your company time, money, and momentum.
💡 So how do you decide whether to hire a full-time expert or run a challenge event? Here’s a strategic guide to help you make the right call.
📌 Best for: Long-term, ongoing needs
Hiring is the right choice when:
✅ The role requires
deep, continuous expertise
✅ The problem is
well-defined and needs ongoing execution
✅ The skills are
crucial to core business operations
📌 Example:
✅ Key Benefits of Hiring:
✔ Builds
long-term knowledge and stability
✔ Provides
consistent, ongoing support
✔ Helps
scale and grow your company sustainably
📌 Best for: One-time innovation needs & breakthrough solutions
A challenge event—like a hackathon or innovation competition—is the better option when:
✅ The problem requires
new perspectives and creativity
✅ You want to
test multiple solutions before committing
✅ The task is
project-based and not an ongoing need
📌 Example:
✅
Key Benefits of a Challenge Event:
✔ Provides
multiple perspectives and fresh ideas
✔ Tests solutions
without committing to long-term costs
✔ Attracts
hidden talent that might not apply for a job directly
💡 Sometimes, the best approach is to run a challenge first—then hire the top performers.
📌 Example:
✅ Why This Works:
✔ You
reduce hiring risk by testing candidates in real-world scenarios.
✔ You
get high-impact solutions and a talent pipeline at the same time.
✔ You
save money by ensuring a good hire before committing to a full salary.
🚨 Hiring too soon can waste budget on the wrong skill set. Running a challenge when you need full-time support can delay execution.
💡 The key is knowing when to bring in long-term expertise—and when to leverage a challenge to find breakthrough solutions.
Want expert help deciding whether to hire or run an event? 📩 Email me at casim@calsafjula.com to schedule a meeting.