Should You Hire—or Host a Challenge? Here’s How to Decide in STEM

When faced with a project need, talent gap, or innovation bottleneck, most STEM organizations default to hiring. But is hiring always the best first move?



The truth is, sometimes a targeted challenge event—like a hackathon, design sprint, or innovation competition—can solve the problem more effectively and with greater ROI. Here’s how to choose between the two:

When It’s Better to Hire Directly

Hiring is the right move when:

• The challenge is sustained and clearly scoped

• You need ongoing execution, not ideation

• The role requires deep organizational knowledge or stakeholder alignment

• You have time (and budget) for onboarding and integration

Example: A biotech startup needs a senior scientist to lead clinical trials over the next 2 years.

When It’s Better to Host a Challenge Event

A well-designed event is the better move when:

• The problem is still being defined

• You want to test multiple solution paths quickly

• You need diverse thinking from outside your team

• You’re open to discovering both solutions and talent in one shot

Key Benefits of Challenge Events:

• Speed: Solve in weeks vs. a 3–4 month hiring cycle

• Cost: Lower commitment upfront

• Talent Visibility: See who shines under pressure

• Innovation: Discover unexpected solutions from outsiders

Hybrid Approach: Do Both

Many teams now host a challenge first, then hire the top performer or team. This strategy reduces hiring risk and validates the value of the role.

Lead with the Problem, Not the Process

Not every challenge needs a new hire. Sometimes, a challenge event gets better results—and faster.

Want help designing a challenge that solves your problem and sources the right talent?

📩 Email me at casim@calsafjula.com to schedule a meeting if you need help or want to hire me to do it for you.